Just this month the Canadian Press reported that in October 2009, Bob Paulson, the current head of the RCMP intervening for that organization insisted “As it is being applied now the (security certificate) is completely off the rails. That he was still chosen to lead the RCMP shows that this fact is well-accepted within Canadian security and intelligence circles.
In the months to come Mr Mahjoub may have his certificate deemed unreasonable and he could walk free. Or Justice Blanchard could bend to political pressure, and uphold the reasonability of the security certificate, forcing Mr Mahjoub to appeal the decision all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.
Mr Mahjoub’s life rests in the hands of a court before which he has never been charged. The judge making the decision is privy to allegations that Mr Mahjoub has been barred from seeing and thus from defending himself against.
We have no faith in such an unjust legal system but we do believe in the power of people. Over the last thirteen years, countless community mobilizations have pushed back against the security certificate regime, leading to them being deemed unconstitutional in 2008 and resulting in the freeing of Adil Charkoui and Hassan Almrei.
We are calling on supporters to take action when the decision is rendered. To celebrate our power and call for accountability if Mr Mahjoub is set free, and to show our displeasure if he is not. We will have one week’s notice before the decision is made and will be letting our supporters know immediately. Please plan actions that you can organize quickly and email email@example.com to make sure you are the first to get any updates. If you are on facebook, please “like” www.facebook.com/
We will be updating our supporters when new information becomes available.
In struggle and solidarity,
Justice for Mahjoub Committee
Category Uncategorized | Tags:
By Matthew Behrens, Dec. 21, 2012 rabble.ca
Most couples sitting in courtrooms are there for separation and divorce proceedings. Not so Sophie and Mohamed (Moe) Harkat, who have spent years in court because they desperately wish to stay together. The Ottawa couple have spent the past decade resisting with all their might the attempt to make their marriage a threesome by a secretive party who, in a manner that most relationship counsellors would mark as a major red flag moment, refuses to be open and honest, all the while it questions the authenticity of the Harkats’ love for one another.
While the Harkats would agree with the late Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau that the state should stay out of the bedrooms of the nation, it is the secret trial security certificate legislation introduced by Trudeau that has resulted in Ottawa’s perverse attempts to record, analyze and cross-examine the couple’s most intimate moments. Under the secret trial provisions, the federal government can declare any refugee or permanent resident a threat to national security and then refuse to explain why. This relic of the Spanish Inquisition, which bears striking resemblances to the security laws under apartheid South Africa and Pinochet’s Chile, continues to be pursued at the Federal Court of Canada, almost six years after it was found unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
December 10, International Human Rights Day, marked the 10th anniversary of this relationship between the Harkats and the secretive party, resulting in cameras at entrances to the Harkat home, phone taps on their line, a prohibition on cell phone and Internet use, being followed by armed men everywhere they go, having to find housing that will accommodate a parking spot for those who would surveil them, house raids by police with sniffer dogs, and dozens of other indignities.
The ultimate insult is that whenever Moe moves in bed or goes to the refrigerator for a glass of juice, the government knows because of the GPS monitoring device permanently strapped to his leg.
The Harkats’ story is eerily reminiscent of the stalker movie Fatal Attraction, but in this case, the Glenn Close character is played by agents of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), the scandal-plagued, inept spy agency whose profoundly single-minded obsession with Moe and a series of allegations that they refuse to make public have resulted in the Kafkaesque nightmare that the Harkats continue to live daily. CSIS has yet to boil a cute bunny rabbit in the Harkat kitchen, but the ultimate goal of their efforts is equally gruesome: they seek to deport Moe to Algeria, where he would face torture.
This is not a case for mediation. It’s equally unsuitable for a proper legal proceeding, given that security certificates by legislation are based on information not normally admissible in a court of law. Hearsay, guilt by alleged association, and the lowest standards of proof in any court in Canada make for a dysfunctional show trial in the Federal Court, which for 21 years has provided judicial cover for thinly veiled renditions to torture.
To mark their 10th anniversary, the Harkats received a rather peculiar but hopeful gift: a 2013 invitation to argue their case at the Supreme Court of Canada, which for the third time since 2006 will consider the draconian legislation that’s been condemned by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and various United Nations bodies, in addition to thousands of people across the country.
During the 2006 hearing, five Muslim men were subject to the draconian process, four of them detained without charge at the Guantanamo North facility in Kingston, one under house arrest. When the court unanimously found the process unconstitutional because it denied the named individual the right to know the case against them, the issue went back to the government. The detainees themselves called on Ottawa to treat them as they would any Canadian citizen under similar circumstances: if evidence actually did exist, charge them in a fair and open criminal proceeding, with the attendant procedural safeguards and protections, or let them go free.
But the government, along with a clearly biased Federal Court, chose to return to their old ways with some window dressing changes. Indeed, one Federal Court judge showed her preferential option for the powerful when she declared, “I do not believe that the Supreme Court intended the previous rulings are to be revisited or that current proceedings necessarily are to be altered as a result of its determination.” In addition, the Federal Court played partisan when it funded a study on continuing this process with the addition of special advocates, security-cleared lawyers who could see some of the secret case. That was the change introduced by the Harper minority government and passed with the shameful complicity of the Ignatieff Liberals. The secret trial process began anew for five Muslim men in February, 2008.
Shortly afterwards, the case against Montrealer Adil Charkaoui was withdrawn, and in 2009, Hassan Almrei became the first of the five to win a case on its merits when it was discovered CSIS agents “were in breach of their duty of candour to the Court.”
Since then, the Harkats learned one of the potential informers in their case was carrying on an affair with a CSIS officer investigating them. CSIS also withheld information indicating an informer had failed a polygraph test. The Federal Court refused to throw out the case, but did declare “it was found to be necessary to repair the damage done to the administration of justice and to re-establish a climate of trust and confidence in this proceeding.”
Meanwhile, most of the draconian conditions against Harkat were lifted, and the couple suddenly had hope that the end was near. But the security certificate against Harkat was upheld in 2010 based solely on secret allegations Harkat was still not allowed to see and challenge. At the time, Harkat lawyer Norm Boxall asked, “What can an innocent person do other than to say ‘I didn’t do it,’ and then to be told that they’re a liar based on material they can’t face?”
In 2013, the core issue, unremarkably, boils down to the same problem that the Supreme Court identified in its 2007 decision: how can one meet a case that one does not know? How the court decides the issue will impact not only Toronto’s Mohammad Mahjoub and Mahmoud Jaballah, both of whom are still waging a defence against allegations that date back to the mid 1990s, but also a whole class of refugees who are increasingly being deemed “inadmissible” to Canada based on secretive allegations.
In their appeal to the Supreme Court, Harkat lawyers Boxall and Matt Webber note Harkat is not alleged to be a danger to Canada, and that the two main witnesses in the public portion of the secret hearing had no personal or direct knowledge of the case against Harkat. Much of the case was also based on summaries of alleged phone intercepts, the originals of which had been destroyed, as well as secret informants, none of whom were allowed to be cross-examined by the special advocates in a secret session.
Harkat’s lawyers call the public proceedings “more a façade than a constitutionally compliant opportunity to know and challenge” the allegations. In 2007, the Supreme Court found that that secrecy and non-disclosure, “coupled with the grave intrusions imposed on a detainee, makes it difficult, if not impossible, to find substitute procedures” that would satisfy an individual’s Charter rights. The country’s highest court also declared “fundamental justice requires substantial compliance with the venerated principle that a person whose liberty is in jeopardy must be given an opportunity to know the case to meet, and an opportunity to meet the case.”
Clearly, the role of the special advocates — who have taken on the tricky and problematic position of playing a restricted role in a secret proceeding while at the same time ferreting out significant details and the release of materials that no judge would be capable of doing on his own — has made some difference in these cases. But it has not been enough, for they cannot be an adequate substitute to the detainee knowing the true nature of the case against them. The fact that two cases have been thrown out does not mean the system works or is compliant with fundamental rights. In Harkat’s case, his lawyers note, Moe remains a “non-participant in the vast majority of the proceeding. The evidence that truly matters to him remains unknown.”
Throw into the mix memos released last December in which CSIS acknowledged to the Public Safety Minister that none of these cases could stand if torture-gleaned evidence had to be removed, coupled with the major findings of CSIS malfeasance in two federal torture inquiries, and one can see that the house of cards is about to fall.
Significantly, with one bizarre exception, CSIS, after initiating 1-3 certificates a year from 1991 to 2003, has not issued a new certificate since May, 2003, a remarkable restraining of state power by grassroots organizing initiated and led by the Campaign to Stop Secret Trials in Canada since August, 2001. But the human damage left behind remains all too real, from the devastating physical consequences of 100-day hunger strikes, years in solitary confinement, the psychological torture of limbo and the threat of deportation to torture, to government-sponsored home invasions, the ripple effects on families and communities, and the scarlet letter of always being a “suspected terrorist” in Google searches.
But while security certificates appear headed for the dustbin of history, some of their more pernicious attributes remain in place under the Orwellian-named Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.
Barb Jackman, a lawyer who likely has more experience with such cases than anyone else in Canada (dating back to the 1980s), notes that security certificate proceedings represent the tip of a rapidly growing iceberg, stating that “hundreds and hundreds of people [are] accused of being terrorists in the other secret process before the immigration division members. Those people are equally wallowing in the same kind of mistreatment [as the secret trial detainees]. It’s just not on the public radar because it’s not in the press. You might say the [security certificate] cases may end and that’s the end of the problem. But it’s not. They’ve created an octopus. I have an office full — dozens of people — who are facing secret hearings in another context before people who aren’t even judges and certainly are not fair in the way that they handle the cases.”
While advocates rally around the three remaining secret trial detainees at the Supreme Court, they recognize that their work is far from over as repressive measures continue to grow against increasing numbers of asylum seekers in Canada.
Matthew Behrens is a freelance writer and social justice advocate who co-ordinates the Homes not Bombs non-violent direct action network. He has worked closely with the targets of Canadian and U.S. ‘national security’ profiling for many years.
Category Uncategorized | Tags:
Actions are being organized across Canada in solidarity with security certificate detainees Mohammad Mahjoub, Mohamed Harkat and Mahmoud Jaballah and all those locked up in immigration detention on December 9th & 10th. Join Us! December 10th marks the 10th year anniversary of Mohamed Harkat’s arrest under a security certificate. Mahjoub will be in court that day in Toronto for a detention review, once again calling on the judge to free him from over twelve years of arbitrary, indefinite detention. It is just a few days before C-31, the law that will see many refugees automatically detained, is expected to be fully implemented. And it is International Human Rights Day.
Toronto: Sounds of Solidarity Rally at Toronto Immigration Holding Centre on Dec. 9th at 4pm. Buses leave at 3pm from Fed Court House, 180 Queen West. Contact: Justice for Mahjoub Network, firstname.lastname@example.org.
Ottawa: Visual presentation/rally on Parliament Hill on Dec. 10th at 10am. Contact: Justice for Mohamed Harkat Committee, email@example.com.
Vancouver: International Human Rights Day Candlelight Vigil at Vancouver Art Gallery – Robson Square side on Dec. 9th at 4:30 pm, www.facebook.com/events/393827600697261/?ref=ts&fref=ts. Contact: Siraat, salaamvancouver@salaamcanada.
Calgary: Info-Picket at 615 MacLeod Trail Southeast on Dec. 9th. from 1pm to 2pm. Contact: Anti-Racist Action Calgary, firstname.lastname@example.org
Saskatoon: Info-picket at 12pm on Dec. 9th.
Regina: Info-picket on December 6th. Contact: Making Peace Vigil, email@example.com, http://makingpeace.wordpress.com/
Montreal: Sounds of Solidarity Rally at Laval Immigration Prevention Centre on Dec. 10th at 10am. Colourful car convoy leaves Rosemont metro at 9am. Reserve seat: People’s Commission Network, firstname.lastname@example.org. www.facebook.com/events/414489011953357/
Halifax: Info-picket on Dec 10th. No One Is Illegal Halifax, http://noii-halifax.blogspot.ca/
For over a decade now, Mohammad Mahjoub, Mohamed Harkat and Mahmoud Jaballah have lived in arbitrary and inhumane detention as a result of security certificates. Mahjoub was imprisoned for 8 years (including 2.5 years in solitary) and has now spent over 4.5 years under continuing house arrest and conditions; Harkat was imprisoned for 3.5 years (including 1 year in solitary) and has already spent 6.5 years under continuing house arrest and conditions; Jaballah was imprisoned for over six years prison (including over one year in solitary) and has now spent 5.5 years under continuing house and conditions… yet, none of them has ever been charged.
Mssrs. Mahjoub, Harkat and Jaballah are three of the thousands of migrants in Canada who spend more time in worse jails simply because they don’t have full immigration status. With the full implementation of Bill C-31 in December, and with Bill C-43 looming in Parliament, increasing numbers of migrants will find themselves behind bars. Since the Harper government came in to power in 2006, over 72,000 people have been locked up in immigration detention. This includes families and children as well as those jailed in maximum security prisons without access to service or programs.
Justice for Mahjoub Network
The Justice for Mohamed Harkat Committee
Justice for Jaballah
No One Is Illegal – Toronto
People’s Commission Network
Anarchist Black Cross – Toronto
Category Uncategorized | Tags:
Andrew Duffy, The Ottawa Citizen, 16 November 2010
Federal security agents recorded 171 phone calls between suspected terrorist Mahmoud Jaballah and his lawyers after they agreed to halt the practice in December 2008. That revelation is contained in a recent order issued by Federal Court Judge Kevin Aalto, who condemns the repeated breaches of solicitor-client privilege. “Solicitor-client privilege is virtually sacrosanct in the Canadian judicial system,” Aalto said in ordering two federal agencies to turn over a raft of documents to Jaballah’s defence team. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the Canada Border Services Agency must provide Jaballah with documents related to their policies on intercepting solicitor-client communications.
They must also turn over any documents that reveal how the privileged information was used in the security certificate case.
Category Media Coverage | Tags:
Colin Perkel, Canadian Press, 7 May 2010
TORONTO – Canadian authorities are accusing an Egyptian man who is under stringent house arrest as a threat to national security of breaching his bail conditions for having plastic toy guns in his home.
In a move Mahmoud Jaballah’s son denounced as ridiculous, the Canada Border Services Agency is asking the courts to seize more than $43,000 in bail money and force sureties to pay another $56,000.
Category Media Coverage | Tags:
The Supreme Court ruled in its Charkaoui II decision in June 2008 that CSIS’s systematic practice of destroying evidence was unconstitutional. The judgement required the government to retain and disclose to reviewing judges all relevant information and further required the judges to disclose as much of this information as was compatible with their idea of national security to the individual concerned. This ruling had broad ramifications not only for the security certificate cases, but many others in which CSIS was involved.
Read the Charkaoui II decision here.
Category Documents | Tags:
Amar Walla’s 20-minute film, The Good Son, is a dramatic representation of the Jaballah family’s first realization that Canada wasn’t the shangri la of human rights they had believed in.
View The Good Son here.
Category Audio and Video | Tags:
Michelle Shepherd, Toronto Star, 7 March 2007
Toronto terrorism suspect Mahmoud Jaballah will be released on strict bail conditions after more than five years in jail without charges, despite government protests he remains a danger to Canada.
His release comes on the heels of last month’s Supreme Court ruling that struck down an immigration law as unconstitutional and deals another blow to the government’s handling of security cases involving non-citizens.
“It’s a very happy day for my family. We’re really looking forward to getting him back home and getting on with our lives,” said Jaballah’s eldest son Ahmad yesterday outside the courthouse.
Category Media Coverage | Tags:
On 23 February 2007, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in its Charkaoui I decision that the security certificate process was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court struck down the entire section but suspended the effect of their ruling for one year.
Read the Charkaoui I decision here.
Category Documents | Tags:
Developments since May 2005
A January 2007 report by Human Rights Watch which examines, inter alia, Canada’s security certificate cases, including Mahmoud Jaballah’s, as violations of the absolute prohibition of torture in international law.
Category Documents | Tags: